Home » Sectors » Gujarat, Chhattisgarh & Goa Hold Back Minority Scholarships Despite Funds

Gujarat, Chhattisgarh & Goa Hold Back Minority Scholarships Despite Funds

Share with your friends










Submit
8
Shares
Views
1480

 

Highlights

 

* Gujarat, Goa and Chhattisgarh fail to implement central scheme

*Over Rs 1,150 crore scholarships disbursed to nearly 11 million students

*Scholarships distributed on an almost 50-50 ratio between boys and girls

 

Do students from minority communities deserve scholarships? That’s a policy question for debate but interestingly while the Centre thinks so, some states in India clearly differ or are not implementing existing scholarship schemes effectively. Meanwhile, minority or not, thousands of students in the country are going without much needed financial aid to pursue their education.

 

IndiaSpend’ Sourjya Bhowmick  looked at the pre-metric scholarships offered by the Central Government (minority affairs ministry) to the states. Three states – Gujarat, Goa and Chhattisgarh – have failed to implement the central scheme. Incidentally, Gujarat, Goa and Chhattisgarh also have higher out-of-school minority children compared to the national average.  Most other states, however, have crossed their targets and the amount released exceeds the budget estimates every year.

 

The pre-metric scholarship scheme was started in 2008-09. The basic idea is to encourage families from minority communities to send their children to school (reduce their financial burden by giving them scholarships). Minority students who secure not less than 50% in the previous final examination and the annual income of guardians does not exceed Rs 1 lakh are eligible for the scholarships. The Central Government gives 75% of the scholarship while the State bears the remaining 25%. Surprisingly, the scholarship is distributed on an almost 50-50 ratio between boys and girls.

 

The scholarship covers admission fee of Rs 500 per annum and tuition fee of Rs 350 per annum. It also includes a maintenance fee of Rs 600 per month for Hostellers and Rs 100 per month for day scholars.

 

Before we analyse the performance of the states, let us look at the total scholarships allotted and expenditure since inception.

 
Table 1: Promoting Education

 

 

Barring first year, the amount sanctioned has always overshot the budget estimates. In 2012-13, i.e. the current financial year, data is till June 30, 2012, and the amount sanctioned is lower than the budget estimate. At the same time, the achievement rate has been good compared to the target, which has automatically led to more expenditure.

 

Table 2 gives the community-wise break-up of scholarships since inception till 2011-12:

 

Table 2: Overshooting Targets

 

 

(Others*: Buddhists+Parsis)

 

So, how are the states doing?

 

Table 3 gives the data of the top 10 states based on the amount disbursed to them, scholarships targeted and achieved from 2008-2012:

 

Table 3: Disbursing Funds

 

 

So, over Rs 1,153 crore has been disbursed to nearly 11 million students. All these states crossed their targets in awarding scholarships, which has led to revenue estimates to shoot up every year. The amount is sanctioned based on the scholarships given out.

 

However, there are a few states that have held back on the scholarships.  The following table gives an idea:

 

Table 4: The Laggards

 

 

It is clear from the table that these three states are the laggards in the programme. Out of a target of over 200,000 scholarships, only 26,696 scholarships have been given till now. And Gujarat has not distributed any scholarship till now!

 

Table 5 gives an idea of out-of-school children (minorities), aged 6-17 years, in these states as compared to the national average:

 

Table 5: No Scholarships, No Students?

 

 

 

 

Gujarat has an out-of-school rate (Muslims) which is higher than the national average. Out-of-school rate for Christians in Chhattisgarh and Gujarat is also higher than the national average.

 

As per media reports, the Gujarat government is opposing the scheme saying it is not compulsory and that it discriminates among different religions.

 

So, while most states are doing well to promote education among minorities, some others are not. We are not clear about other reasons for this but the issue clearly deserves more policy debate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*