So what affects women voting patterns? What are the other factors at play? Is literacy a factor too? Thus, is there a link between education and participation of women in the political arena, both as candidates and as voters?
Let’s start with some base numbers. Census 2011 data shows that the number of educated females has increased from 54.1% in 2001 to 65.4% in 2011. Thus, there has been an 8.6 percentage point rise in women literacy in India from 2001 to 2011. Further, Kerala has the highest literacy rate of 92% among females followed by Himachal Pradesh with 73% while Rajasthan had the lowest literacy rate of 52.7% among females followed by Bihar with 53.3%.
Women & Political Participation
Now, we are defining political participation as voting in elections and contesting as candidates in elections. For our analysis, we will be looking at the general elections of 2004 and 2009. At first, we will look at the polling percentages in the states with high female literacy rates.
Table 2: Voting In States With High Female Literacy Rates
If we look at the states with high female literacy, polling percentages among female voters is much better than the national average. West Bengal shows the best performance with respect to female polling percentage with 75% in 2004 and 80% in 2009.
Table 3: Women Candidates in States With High Literacy Rates
The table above shows the number of female candidates who contested and won the elections in 2004 and 2009 within the states with high female literacy. At the national level, we can see that more females contested in 2009 than in 2004.However, the winning percentage of female candidates has gone down from 12.6% in 2004 to 10% in 2009.
Let us now look at states with low female literacy.
Table 4: Women Voting In States With Low Female Literacy
If we look at the states with low female literacy, the polling percentages among female voters is much lower than the national average. Bihar shows the best performance with respect to female polling percentage with 51% in 2004 and Jharkhand with 47% in 2009.
Table 5: Women Candidates In States With Low Female Literacy
We can see that most states with low female literacy rates have actually seen an increase in the number of female candidates. And the number of winners has also seen an improvement.
Firstly, overall participation of women is low in states with low female literacy and high in states with high literacy. Also, even though female literacy improved in the last decade, voter participation among women has not increased much. The 1999 general elections recorded 55% participation of female voters and so did in 2009. This figure did not improve in the last decade despite improvement in literacy rates among women. Incidentally, there is no correlation between males and literacy. In states with low literacy rates, the gaps between total voter participation and female voter participation are higher. So, literate or not, males are participating at same proportions.
Secondly, the gap in female participation (as voters) and overall participation declined in the 2009 elections. Thirdly, the gap in participation of women in elections as candidates is higher in the states with low female literacy. So, we can conclude that while literacy has somewhat limited impact on the data at the national level when it comes to voting, it shows a clear impact on pushing percentages higher in states with high female literacy.