Home » Cover Story » Gujarat projects: Jayanthi Natarajan’s prime target

Gujarat projects: Jayanthi Natarajan’s prime target

Govindraj Ethiraj,
Share with your friends



The scene at one of the delayed projects, the Jindal Power and Steel complex in Odisha


Former Environment & Forests Minister Jayanthi Natarajan’s resignation drama may be quickly receding from public memory but some of the charges levelled by her in her farewell letter to Sonia Gandhi are worth revisiting.


Ms. Natarajan claimed in the letter that she was being unfairly accused of delaying large infrastructure projects in 2013 while she was only carrying out instructions sent to her by Rahul Gandhi, Congress vice-president. The letter was accessed by the newspaper The Hindu and created a furore within the Congress party and gave the ruling BJP party additional ammunition to fling at the previous government for the economic slowdown generally and stuck projects specifically.


Looking at data from that period, it now appears that the majority of the projects stuck with the Ministry of Environment & Forests she headed in December 2013 were located in the state of Gujarat, whose Chief Minister was Narendra Modi of rival BJP, the party that came to power in the May 2014 parliamentary elections.


Data tabled in the Rajya Sabha shows that as on August 2013, of the 330 project proposals lying with the Ministry of Environment, Gujarat led the list with 52 projects.


Madhya Pradesh (MP), Chattisgarh and Punjab were the other big states with projects awaiting clearances.



MP had 15, Chattisgarh had 14 while Punjab had 28 projects stuck. Odisha, not surprisingly, is high on the list, with 25 projects stuck. Given that Punjab and Chattisgarh are relatively smaller states, the numbers seem high. Though in the case of Punjab, it would seem that most of the projects were in mining.


Gujarat incidentally was followed by Maharashtra at 44 pending project proposals and then Andhra at 34.


“Among the main reasons for slow growth during the UPA Government’s term, was delays in granting permission to projects. They used to get satisfaction by giving people trouble.”


Interestingly, except for Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh, all other states were ruled by non-UPA parties. Punjab had the Shiromani Akali Dal, MP and Chattisgarh had BJP in power while Odisha had Biju Janata Dal which is non-aligned. Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh were ruled by Congress chief ministers.


While there may not be political overtones to the lack of clearances since things were slowing down in general across the board and different states might have had different sizes of project pipelines, it is a coincidence of sorts, particularly in the case of Gujarat which has been trying hard to ramp up its industrial activity.


Finance Minister Arun Jaitley called the episode ‘sadistic capitalism’. “Among the main reasons for slow growth during the UPA Government’s term, was delays in granting permission to projects. They used to get satisfaction by giving people trouble,” he told Times of India.


Jaitley said Natarajan’s letter “conclusively establishes” it was not the statutory or mandatory considerations which weighed on the ruling party in this report.


“But what weighed on them was the whims of political leaders of the party as to who is to be granted environmental permission and who is not to be granted an environmental permission,” said the Finance Minister. In a scenario where whims overtake legal requirements, it becomes a textbook case of “crony capitalism, which the UPA was practising.”


While the BJP mined (pun intended) the episode for its political capital, the allegations made by the former Environment & Forests Minister in her letter do place question marks on all projects gathering dust within the ministry.


Incidentally, there were four nuclear power projects in Rajasthan, Haryana and Sikkim stuck for environmental clearances too. Note that nuclear power plants by mandate can only be built by the federal Government. Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had campaigned hard for the cause of nuclear energy.


This article is not delving into the relative merit of each project for it is likely that some projects were genuinely environmentally more sensitive. Or may have been, like in the case of the Vedanta project, rejected by the people of the land where it was meant to come up.


With additional reporting by Abheet Singh Sethi


(Govindraj Ethiraj is the founder of IndiaSpend and Abheet Singh Sethi is a policy analyst/research writer at IndiaSpend.)




“Liked this story? Indiaspend.org is a non-profit, and we depend on readers like you to drive our public-interest journalism efforts. Donate Rs 500; Rs 1,000, Rs 2,000.”

  1. Ashok Reply

    February 9, 2015 at 1:13 pm

    Dear Mr Ethiraj,

    For a site focussing on data journalism, there are some serious lapses in this article.

    1) Headline uses the word “prime target”. This would mean disproportionately higher projects in Gujarat compared to other states.

    2) However in para 2 the characterization of this targeting is changed by saying ‘majority of projects’. Now the word ‘majority’ means more than half. However Gujarat’s total is 1/6th of total (52 Guj/330 whole India). So the right phrasing would be ‘Gujarat lead the table in maximum number of projects stalled’. Majority would have mean > 330/2

    3) Then below the table you have called it a “coincidence of sorts”. Which is very different characterization from the screaming headline.

    As one who works with words and numbers , I hope you hold yourself to a higher standard than this.

  2. Ashok Reply

    February 9, 2015 at 1:16 pm

    Ofcourse , you have also not pointed out the possibility that given that Gujarat has very high industrial activity this could just be a statistical outcome.

    None of this is to say that the UPA was washed in milk. But I hope you can do a better job as I liked your work from your CNBC days.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *