In Uttar Pradesh, the number of public health centres (PHCs), the frontline of the government’s healthcare system, decreased 8% over 15 years to 2015, a period when the state’s population increased by more than 25%; smaller sub centres, the first point of public contact, increased by no more than 2% over 25 years to 2015, a period when the population grew by more than 51%.
These data, from the Rural Health Statistics (RHS), 2015, indicate how successive UP governments have neglected the need of affordable, accessible and quality healthcare for the 200 million people–only five countries have larger populations–of India’s most populous state, home to nearly a fifth of all Indians.
The result of this neglect is manifest in the major indicators of UP’s health deprivation, according to various government data sets that we studied:
- A new-born in UP is expected to live four years fewer than in the neighbouring state of Bihar, five years fewer than in Haryana and seven years fewer than in Himachal Pradesh.
- UP contributed to the largest share of almost all communicable and non-communicable disease deaths, including: 48% of all typhoid deaths (2014); 17% of cancer deaths and 18% of tuberculosis deaths (2015).
- After Assam, UP has India’s second-highest maternal mortality rate (MMR); 285 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births (2013), with 62% of pregnant women unable to access minimum ante-natal care.
- The inaccessibility of institutional care is evident from the fact that around 42% pregnant women, more than 1.5 million, deliver babies at home.
- About two thirds (61%) of home deliveries in UP are unsafe, meaning they were not attended by a health professional, leading to maternal and child mortality and morbidity.
- UP has the highest child mortality indicators, from the neonatal mortality rate (NNMR) to the under-five mortality rate. Of 64 children who die per 1,000 live births before five years of age, 35 die within a month of birth, and 50 do not complete a year of life.
- Universal immunisation plays a key role in decreasing child mortality: About half of UP’s children are not vaccinated (2013).
- Of those who survive, more than half of children (50.4%) younger than five have recorded stunted growth (national average: 38.7%), the highest stunting rate in India.
- Between 2006 and 2014, on average, the proportion of stunted children below five in India fell from 48% to 38.7%. The comparable data for UP were 56.8% to 50.4% (progress similar to Bihar: 55.6% to 48.4%, Jharkhand: 49.8% to 47.4% and Jammu and Kashmir: 35% to 31.7%)
Over the last decade, several surveys, reporting and independent studies have revealed wide healthcare disparities across India and the situation in social-economically backward states, such as UP, which is not alone. It is one of eight states that comprise the empowered action group (EAG) of backward states (formerly called the BIMARU states)–UP, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Jharkhand, Bihar, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand–identified in 2005 for special attention.
But over the last decade, that attention has not resulted in any significant progress in UP, one of the poorest-performing of the eight EAG states, much like Bihar, Jharkhand and Jammu & Kashmir.
Why a decade of progress across India escaped UP
Healthcare has been low on the priorities of successive UP governments. The per capita expenditure on health in UP increased from Rs. 260 to Rs. 372 over four years to 2010, according to this 2012 National Institute of Public Finance and Policy report, compared to Rs 356 to Rs 580 in Kerala and from Rs 299 to Rs 579 in Tamil Nadu over the same same period.
Among the major states of India, UP, Assam, Madhya Pradesh and Odisha account for the lowest life expectancy at birth, in contrast to the decade-long progress evident in most southern, western and eastern states.
What are the reasons for UP’s poor healthcare record? A combination of several factors, such as a shortage of healthcare professionals, increasing cost of healthcare, the mushrooming of private healthcare and a lack of planning.
A third of the rural population in UP has been deprived of primary healthcare infrastructure, according to the norms of the Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS), which sets infrastructural and human resource standards for public health institutions in India.
UP requires 31,037 sub centres, 5,172 PHCs and 1,293 community health centres (CHCs) to meet the healthcare demands of its population. But UP is 33% short of sub centres and PHCs and 40% short of CHCs, according to RHS-2015 data.
This shortage of public healthcare institutions further impacts the implementation of centrally sponsored health programmes, which in turn require an effective network of public health institutions.
No expansion of public healthcare institutions over last 15 years
As we said, successive state governments have failed to plan, prioritise and understand healthcare needs.
The number of sub centres in UP increased 1.8%–from 20,153 to 20,521–over 25 years to 2015, a period when the population grew by more than 51%.
PHCs increased 225% between 1985 to 2002, but there has been a steady decline since. PHCs have been decreasing 8% over 15 years, from 3,808 in 2002 to 3,497 in 2015, a period when the state’s population increased by about 25% to 30%.
Since governments have failed to increase public-health institutions to match population growth, millions are deprived of basic healthcare and existing facilities are overcrowded, made worse by substandard health facilities.
No health sub centre meets the government’s quality and staffing norms
Only 21% of sub centres and PHCs, and 26% of CHCs, in India meet the quality norms of IPHS-2012, according to RHS-2015. In UP, no sub centre complies with IPHS norms, and only 5% of PHCs and 17% of CHCs meet those norms.
Over the last nine years, there has been almost no upgradation of institutions offering basic healthcare. No more than four of 773 CHCs are adequately staffed and serviced with drugs and supplies, according to this 2015-16 report of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM); 467 CHCs did not have minimum infrastructure and staff.
Medical and paramedical staff–in short supply across India, as IndiaSpend reported in September 2016–are in particularly short supply in UP, especially the rural areas.
Source: Compiled from Rural Health Statistics-2015
The shortage of health workers can be addressed since there has been a significant increase in the number of trained medical and paramedical professionals, both in the state and country.
Low-quality private healthcare services thrive in UP
UP’s inadequate public-health infrastructure has provided space for private healthcare systems to thrive. In India, the private healthcare system now provides two-thirds of medical treatment, according to this April 2016 Health in India report from the ministry of statistics.
In UP, private health providers–including unrecognised doctors and quacks–meet 85% of medical needs, according to the report.
“Health care in UP can be summarised as a composite challenge of access, quality and demand,” said the state’s Annual Plan Report for 2014-15. “The large public sector does not have adequate access besides being found wanting in quality of care at the cutting edge (PHCs and Sub-Centres). The private sector has access but poses a challenge on account of a serious lack of quality to the extent that it often becomes a threat to the health of people.”
It appears that the people of UP have two choices: an inadequate, inefficient public healthcare system and a private healthcare system offering low quality and expensive services.
UP patients incur highest medical costs among poor states, double national average
With few other options, UP’s people must frequent the private healthcare system, where the average per person cost of treatment of one ailment is highest amongst most poor (EAG) states (see graph below).
The average cost of treatment at sub centres and PHCs in UP is Rs 660 per person, more than double the national average of Rs 312 per person, according to the ministry of statistics report.
Source: Compiled from Health in India, NSS 71st round (January to June 2014)
The ministry’s data also show that normally, the cost of treatment in the public health system is lower than similar treatment in private institutions. However, in UP and Bihar, the cost of treatment in public and private institutions is almost the same.
The high cost of healthcare services further affects people’s ability to access them. Nearly a third (29.43%) of UP’s population lives below the poverty line.
Currently, UP relies on a public healthcare infrastructure that is two decades old. A fifth of the population deprived of healthcare cannot contribute to the social or economic growth of the country.
(Panigrahi is a fellow at the Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies, New Delhi; Singh is an associate fellow.)
We welcome feedback. Please write to email@example.com. We reserve the right to edit responses for language and grammar.
“Liked this story? Indiaspend.org is a non-profit, and we depend on readers like you to drive our public-interest journalism efforts. Donate Rs 500; Rs 1,000, Rs 2,000.”